Once again, the Cliffords prove they are worthy of the Most Lenient Dogparents Award they won at last summer’s Independent Comics Picnic and Honors Ceremony.
Claude doesn’t like the look of it; Clara wears a look of mild concern. But they hold fast to their title by never uttering that cruel word, “No.”
Not even a “Confound it!”, much less a threat of punishment.
They capitulate to the catapult, and give Cleo what she demands.
It’s clearly Claude and Clara who succeeded in obedience school, not Cleo.
Well, no wonder I’m told Macgyver could do so much with duct tape and a paper clip.
I’ve never seen the show, myself, and nobody told me it was giant tape, and a heavy steel paperclip, longer than his foot.
Of course, this isn’t a real product… I saw another version with the same tape, a roll of wire, and some matches, which were on a scale with the paper clip.
He was the go-to man if you needed someone to play an eccentric wacko, or an outright loon. For laughs. It helps to have a rubber face and a flexible voice.
Looking further, I discovered that the picture has people cut off on both sides… Not that it really matters, but just so the names line up, l’m attaching the wider version below.
Anyway…. according to Getty Images…
This is….
The Modern Screen awards, 1956 presentation, televised on the Ed Sullivan show, Dec. 2, 1956.
Left to right; Front row; Victoria Shaw, Tony Perkins, Natalie Wood, Doris Day, holding her award and also award she accepted for Frank Sinatra, King Vidor; who accepted the award for Audrey Hepburn.
Left to right, back row: director George Stevens, Debbie Reynolds, Louella Parsons, George Delacorte, publisher of Modern screen, Janet Leigh, Tony Curtis and Kirk Douglas.
BTW… Modern Screen is/was a popular “movie magazine”… At first it was about movie stars, later adding television stars and personalities.
How far gone am I? When looking at the first, cropped photo, I see the gentleman front and center moving his jaw, like in a tense way. I also see his Adam’s apple move up and down. Maybe it’s a hypnotic illusion from the year of my birth, still working its magic after 69 years.
Believe it or not, this is a real dress, over 4,000 years old, though the original beads have been restrung on stronger thread, without changing the pattern.
(It)” comes from the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, where archaeologists reconstructed a beadnet dress discovered in 1927 in a tomb at Giza. The garment belonged to a woman who lived during the reign of King Khufu (c. 2551–2528 BCE). Although the original linen threads had decayed, approximately 7,000 faience beads remained in place, allowing experts to carefully rebuild the dress. According to the MFA Boston, the beads were originally vibrant shades of blue and green, designed to imitate precious stones like lapis lazuli and turquoise.”
It’s not the only one… I saw pictures of several while searching for info. There’s apparently a bit of debate about how they were worn. Because lapis and turquoise were sacred, some archeologists think they were created as burial garments.
But the edges are fringed with little shells, which make a pleasant sound striking each other, and sometimes have little bits of stone or metal placed inside to make them rattle. This makes other archeologists think they were made for sacred dances.
Most think they were actually worn over other garments, so they’re not as slinky as we imagine… But no one knows for sure. The design and workmanship could give movie costumes a run for their money!
By Antoni Gaudi, one of my favorite architects ever.
It’s unfinished… But I read somewhere that they plan to finish it this year, 100 years after Gaudi died. By “they” I mean I can’t remember who’s doing it, but it’s a World Heritage site.
I’ll try to look it up tomorrow… Right now zzzzzzzzzzz..
.
Fawn is picky.
Buddy eats rocks.
Maggie ate turds. I’d take rocks over that any day.
Once again, the Cliffords prove they are worthy of the Most Lenient Dogparents Award they won at last summer’s Independent Comics Picnic and Honors Ceremony.
Claude doesn’t like the look of it; Clara wears a look of mild concern. But they hold fast to their title by never uttering that cruel word, “No.”
Not even a “Confound it!”, much less a threat of punishment.
They capitulate to the catapult, and give Cleo what she demands.
It’s clearly Claude and Clara who succeeded in obedience school, not Cleo.
.
Today’s dog haiku:
I am your best friend,
Now, always, and especially
When you are eating.
Truth!
Not messin’ with that in a dark alley…
Or a light alley!
Aw, they can be sweethearts! Just socialize them early and often.
…
What is that gadget down in the bottom right corner?
I tried to find out…. Not many talking about it.
Those who did said probably an anvil, but they never saw Macgyver use one.
Everybody was complaining cos there’s no Swiss army knife.
Well, no wonder I’m told Macgyver could do so much with duct tape and a paper clip.
I’ve never seen the show, myself, and nobody told me it was giant tape, and a heavy steel paperclip, longer than his foot.
Of course, this isn’t a real product… I saw another version with the same tape, a roll of wire, and some matches, which were on a scale with the paper clip.
,,
He got to play a lot of fun parts.
He was the go-to man if you needed someone to play an eccentric wacko, or an outright loon. For laughs. It helps to have a rubber face and a flexible voice.
,,.
“A Mickey Mouse” … I guess maybe people called a cartoon the name of character… “I saw a Popeye and a Donald Duck”?
..,
The caption I found has extra names….
Looking further, I discovered that the picture has people cut off on both sides… Not that it really matters, but just so the names line up, l’m attaching the wider version below.
Anyway…. according to Getty Images…
Left to right; Front row; Victoria Shaw, Tony Perkins, Natalie Wood, Doris Day, holding her award and also award she accepted for Frank Sinatra, King Vidor; who accepted the award for Audrey Hepburn.
Left to right, back row: director George Stevens, Debbie Reynolds, Louella Parsons, George Delacorte, publisher of Modern screen, Janet Leigh, Tony Curtis and Kirk Douglas.
BTW… Modern Screen is/was a popular “movie magazine”… At first it was about movie stars, later adding television stars and personalities.
How far gone am I? When looking at the first, cropped photo, I see the gentleman front and center moving his jaw, like in a tense way. I also see his Adam’s apple move up and down. Maybe it’s a hypnotic illusion from the year of my birth, still working its magic after 69 years.
Happens to me all the time when I’m scrolling past, or towards, a photo.
I could swear somebody moved, or the light changed.
Then I stare at it wondering how I saw that, or whether I’m somehow being gaslighted.
,
Gathering all that ash was a big job for the neanderthals in Yellowstone… especially rolling it into a big ball. They were smaller than modern humans.
But the park service probably paid them to get it out of of the way so they could open the.park.
..,
..,,
.,,
Believe it or not, this is a real dress, over 4,000 years old, though the original beads have been restrung on stronger thread, without changing the pattern.
(It)” comes from the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, where archaeologists reconstructed a beadnet dress discovered in 1927 in a tomb at Giza. The garment belonged to a woman who lived during the reign of King Khufu (c. 2551–2528 BCE). Although the original linen threads had decayed, approximately 7,000 faience beads remained in place, allowing experts to carefully rebuild the dress. According to the MFA Boston, the beads were originally vibrant shades of blue and green, designed to imitate precious stones like lapis lazuli and turquoise.”
It’s not the only one… I saw pictures of several while searching for info. There’s apparently a bit of debate about how they were worn. Because lapis and turquoise were sacred, some archeologists think they were created as burial garments.
But the edges are fringed with little shells, which make a pleasant sound striking each other, and sometimes have little bits of stone or metal placed inside to make them rattle. This makes other archeologists think they were made for sacred dances.
Most think they were actually worn over other garments, so they’re not as slinky as we imagine… But no one knows for sure. The design and workmanship could give movie costumes a run for their money!
.,
For a moment I thought
Then before I looked at the later picture…
Actually I think i was picturing the face of the actor that Liverlips guessed, not the one I said.
It was wrong anyway… But on top of that I was mixed up.
Not that such a thing ever happens to me.
My immediate reaction on seeing the “early” photo was
Looks a bit like him too.
👎
Recognized him instantly.
..,,
“I didn’t know this train had a dining car!”
When opportunity knocks, you should always answer.
,,
“My father’s work was Doo Doo !!!”
“Class dismissed.”
,,..
Going by this chart, I’ve got one foot in the 60s and one in the 90s…
But my decades weren’t like these, so I can’t compare.
It’s funny, when people talk about “the 60s”, cos the actual 1960s were split into two parts.
The first half was more like the 50s, and the 2nd half, which is the half that’s pictured, extended well into the 70s.
1965 was a big dividing point for a lot of people.
And that 1970s disco stuff was at the end of that decade.
We want everything to match convenient charts and timelines, but real history is messier that that.
..,,
The Sagrada Família in Barcelona, Spain, photographed during construction in 1905.
By Antoni Gaudi, one of my favorite architects ever.
It’s unfinished… But I read somewhere that they plan to finish it this year, 100 years after Gaudi died. By “they” I mean I can’t remember who’s doing it, but it’s a World Heritage site.
I’ll try to look it up tomorrow… Right now zzzzzzzzzzz..
Male Spotted Towhee in breeding attire with white tail spots.
Very spiffy.
Did he have to rent the outfit, or do they have their own, and bring it out every year?
Looks too sharp to be a rental 😉