September 22, 2026

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
42 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SusanSunshine
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  nighthawks
15 hours ago

Chris Van Allsburg is a writer and illustrator of children’s picture books… though they’re for older children, not toddlers.

This is from his first one, from 1979… the best-selling, “The Garden of Abdul Gasazi”, for which he won a Caldecott Honor.

We had another one of his illustrations a week or so ago… a rather darker looking one. He likes to write scary fantasy, which little kids can handle better than me… in fact, as a child, I liked some horror movies too.

For instance, if you’ve ever seen Jumanji, with Robin Williams, it was based on an Allsburg book… it was very popular. Little kids loved it, but it was a bit too scary for me!

Last edited 12 hours ago by SusanSunshine
SusanSunshine
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  nighthawks
13 hours ago

Weren’t there some guys here a few weeks ago, taking their kids to school in the rain, on bicycles?

SusanSunshine
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  nighthawks
13 hours ago

A young Korean man and his wife in street dress, Seoul, Korea, 1904.
I wanted to find the name of that coat, but so far I haven’t.

I did see some discussion of their clothes, and several pictures of similar outfits.

In fact, all the old pics of the men were similarly dressed, but there were fewer women.

What I read on a Reddit forum with Korean commenters was that this was a coat for an upper class woman, and they thought the man, in middle class dress, was showing off his wealth, by buying it for his wife.

It was the end of the Joseon Dynasty, and middle class women didn’t have to cover up this much, but some did, to emulate the upper class.

They wrote the word for the coat, also his hat and shoes, in Korean script.

It has sleeves, but the back of the large neck opening is worn pulled up over the head.

More_Cats_Than_Sense
Reply to  nighthawks
15 hours ago

I’m going to hazard a guess at Oxford Circus, London, late 1800’s

SusanSunshine
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  More_Cats_Than_Sense
15 hours ago

Great guess!

According to my search, it is, in fact, the traffic on Oxford Circus… which they say was then still known as Regent Circus…. in 1888.

But I do question that last bit, because there’s a sign over the window, on the nearest corner, under a wonderful cartouche, a sign which may even have helped you guess…

While partially obscured, it quite clearly says “Oxford Circus”.

Last edited 15 hours ago by SusanSunshine
More_Cats_Than_Sense
Reply to  SusanSunshine
14 hours ago

That sign might have been a clue 😉

There’s a note near the bottom LH corner that probably says ‘Regent Circus’, and I actually thought of dating it to the late 1880’s, but thought it might have been early 1880’s, so I went with late 1800’s 😉

SusanSunshine
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  More_Cats_Than_Sense
14 hours ago

Whoa, I didn’t even see that faint white writing.. I can barely make it out.

I do think it says Regent Circus.
But it was added to the print, maybe years later…. while the Oxford Circus sign is irrefutably part of the scene.

Liverlips McCracken
Liverlips McCracken
Guest
Reply to  nighthawks
3 hours ago

“… and STAY out!!”

baconboycamper
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  nighthawks
3 hours ago

What? The IKEAâ„¢ instructions weren’t clear enough???

Liverlips McCracken
Liverlips McCracken
Guest
Reply to  nighthawks
3 hours ago

People unclear on the concept.

SusanSunshine
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  nighthawks
13 hours ago

This is a painting! I’d thought it was a photo.

Tim Wilson (American, b1970) – Stairway [oil on paper mounted on linen stretched panel], 2023

SusanSunshine
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  nighthawks
13 hours ago

I’m surprised the cat didn’t run away before she (?) found out it feels good.

Then again, she doesn’t look like the speedy type.

Liverlips McCracken
Liverlips McCracken
Guest
Reply to  SusanSunshine
3 hours ago

I’m guessing she’s familiar with it.

SusanSunshine
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  nighthawks
15 hours ago

I could know what I was opening, and if it looked like that when they tumbled out, I’d still jump.

SusanSunshine
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  nighthawks
14 hours ago

Uh oh… I hope they come in peace.

SusanSunshine
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  SusanSunshine
14 hours ago

As a side note… when I was a little kid in Cleveland, the grocery store where my mom shopped…. I think it was Piggly Wiggly, my favorite name for a store… had a big table of pumpkins out front.

We three kids got to fight over... er… I mean choose… the family pumpkin, which my dad carved.

By the time I was in high school, we lived in Wisconsin. We still got a family pumpkin, but usually my Dad let me carve it. The big ones cost ten cents.

Sometimes, with my own money, I also bought a small one for a nickel, cos I liked carving pumpkins.

I didn’t know the price in Cleveland, but it had probably been about the same, 10 years earlier, cos we didn’t have rampant inflation.

When I moved to California, as a college sophomore, I remember saying that things cost more here. One example was that a smallish pumpkin cost a quarter. A quarter! For one little pumpkin!

I thought of that the other day, seeing that pumpkins now cost as much as…. well… as everything else, I suppose.

But it still surprises me to see them for $8.99.

Last edited 14 hours ago by SusanSunshine
crazeekatlady
crazeekatlady
Guest
Reply to  SusanSunshine
7 hours ago

The 4 of us were either allowed one $0.25 pumpkin each or one big one to share for $1.00 at the farm. Early 1960s.

More_Cats_Than_Sense
Reply to  nighthawks
15 hours ago

I make it:
18

.

The solution:
Double the second number and add the first.

A + (2B) = X

SusanSunshine
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  More_Cats_Than_Sense
14 hours ago

Exactly what I got, only

I was going to say….

IF the problem is worked in rows.

another possible answer….

24.

Multiply the first two numbers and subtract 12.
AB -12 = X

(4×8) -12 =20
(9×3) -12 =15
(6×6) -12 =24

There are probably lots more.

More_Cats_Than_Sense
Reply to  SusanSunshine
9 hours ago

I never said it was the correct answer 😉

baconboycamper
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  SusanSunshine
3 hours ago

I got the same answer, but a different method:

My Calc…
Multiply first two numbers, get the result, then subtract the first two numbers, which in all cases is “12”.

And you are correct, Susan, there are probably lots more,

SusanSunshine
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  nighthawks
14 hours ago

If he’s smart, home watching on TV instead of jammed into that crowd.

More_Cats_Than_Sense
Member
15 hours ago

And these two are:
Elizabeth Taylor and Dana Andrews

In:
Elephant Walk (1954)

Elizabeth-Taylor-and-Dana-Andrews-in-Elephant-Walk-1954
More_Cats_Than_Sense
Member
15 hours ago

Female Red-bellied Woodpecker.

Female-Red-bellied-Woodpecker
SusanSunshine
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  More_Cats_Than_Sense
14 hours ago

Some scientist thought her belly was up there?

Or maybe he just didn’t want to call her a redneck.

Tigressy
Member
Famed Member
Reply to  SusanSunshine
13 hours ago

comment image

42
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x